Terri Schiavo Case
Okay, maybe it's me, but this whole thing seems like a no-brainer (excuse the pun). This poor woman is in her mid-forties and is completely brain dead. The only reason she's still alive is the feeding and hydration tubes she has had in her until recently. He husband (who just happens to have kids with his long time girlfriend) has fought and fought to have these tubes removed, saying it's Terri's wish, without much hard proof. The rest of her family is fighting to have the tubes put back in; even Governor Bush (FL) and several members of Congress have jumped on the bandwagon to replace the tubes. I want to know why this is such a big deal. I understand the concept of this woman's right to life and everything, but really, who is benefitting from her staying alive? Certainly not her. She cannot function as a normal human being; she's been in hospice care for the last 15 years. Honestly, I think her mother and the rest of that side of Terri's family need to just stop being so selfish and let the poor woman go. In a recent press conference Terri Schiavo's mother appealed to other mothers and fathers to think about what they would want for their kids in this situation and then call their congressmen to help her. As a parent I did think about it, and I came to this conclusion: I wouldn't want this life for my child. I would have had those tubes removed when they first made the declaration of brain inactivity. As a parent you want what's best for your child; this is what's best for Terri Schiavo.
